Bonus
This technique can be used to generate time holes that are used to hide events from an observer in temporal cloaking. For 10 points each:
[10h] Name this technique that is often used to study processes on attosecond timescales. To prevent destruction of the gain medium or to stop signal distortion, this technique dispersively stretches the input before dispersively compressing it, unlike more direct counterparts.
ANSWER: chirped pulse amplification [prompt on CPA; prompt on partial answers]
[10e] Chirped pulse amplification is used to increase the power output by these devices, which produce radiation by stimulated emission.
ANSWER: lasers [or light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation]
[10m] Unlike laser gain media, parametric amplification relies on optical effects caused by higher-order components of this quantity. This quantity equals relative permittivity minus one.
ANSWER: electric susceptibility [accept electric susceptibility tensor; prompt on chi-sub-e; reject “magnetic susceptibility”; reject “magnetic susceptibility tensor”]
<Physics>
Answerlines and category may not exactly match the version played at all sites
Conversion
Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chicago A | Toronto A | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | HEM |
Columbia A | Illinois A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
Cornell A | Chicago B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
Florida | Waterloo B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Illinois B | Columbia B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
Iowa State | Johns Hopkins | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
LSE | Georgia State | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
MIT | Texas | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
Maryland | Virginia | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Michigan | North Carolina B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Minnesota | Georgia Tech | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
NYU | British Columbia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | HE |
North Carolina A | Northwestern | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | HE |
Ohio State | Cornell B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Penn State | Ottawa | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Rutgers | Waterloo A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
Toronto C | Toronto B | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | HE |
UC Berkeley A | Indiana | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | HE |
UC Berkeley B | Yale | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
UCF | Vanderbilt | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
Virginia Tech | Harvard | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
WUSTL A | Stanford | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
WUSTL B | Arizona State | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
Winona State | RIT | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Summary
Tournament | Exact Match? | Heard | PPB | Easy % | Medium % | Hard % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 ACF Nationals | Yes | 24 | 16.25 | 100% | 42% | 21% |