Bonus
Prior to calculating these constructions, the reducible representations must be decomposed to find the stretching modes that comprise the basis set. For 10 points each:
[10h] Name these constructions, which can also be calculated by applying symmetry operations to vectors representing bonds in the projection operator method. These constructions serve as symbolic fragments of the non-central atoms of molecules.
ANSWER: SALCs (“salks”) [or symmetry-adapted linear combinations; prompt on LCAOs or linear combinations of atomic orbitals; reject “atomic orbitals” or “orbitals”]
[10m] The symmetries of SALCs are labeled using lowercase Mulliken symbols on the left side of these tables. These tables are used to predict a molecule’s behavior based on its point group.
ANSWER: character tables
[10e] The combination of SALCs is used to create these structures, also denoted by Mulliken symbols, although an asterisk is used to indicate whether they are bonding or antibonding.
ANSWER: molecular orbitals [or MOs; prompt on orbitals; reject “atomic orbitals”]
<Chemistry>
Answerlines and category may not exactly match the version played at all sites
Conversion
Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chicago A | British Columbia | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Columbia A | Toronto B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Cornell A | North Carolina A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Cornell B | Indiana | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Georgia Tech | Arizona State | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Iowa State | MIT | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
LSE | Harvard | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Maryland | Waterloo A | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
NYU | Chicago B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
North Carolina B | Columbia B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Northwestern | Virginia Tech | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Penn State | Rutgers | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
RIT | Virginia | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Texas | UC Berkeley A | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
UC Berkeley B | Stanford | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
UCF | Johns Hopkins | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Vanderbilt | Ottawa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
WUSTL A | Yale | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
WUSTL B | Minnesota | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Waterloo B | Toronto A | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Winona State | Michigan | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | M |
Summary
Tournament | Exact Match? | Heard | PPB | Easy % | Medium % | Hard % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 ACF Nationals | Yes | 21 | 12.38 | 86% | 38% | 0% |