Bonus

In Flast v. Cohen, the Supreme Court set out a “double nexus” that taxpayers must satisfy to meet this requirement. For 10 points each:
[10e] Name this justiciability (“juss-tish-ability”) requirement. Proving that this requirement has been met involves demonstrating redressability, causation, and that the plaintiff has suffered an “injury in fact.”
ANSWER: standing to sue [or locus standi; accept taxpayer standing]
[10h] The Supreme Court decision in this case set forth the primary test for standing. This case concerned whether environmentalists had standing to challenge regulations due to the possible extinction of a species.
ANSWER: Lujan (“LOO-hahn”) v. Defenders of Wildlife [accept either underlined portion]
[10m] The Lujan majority was penned by this conservative justice, whose majority opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller used “textual analysis” to find that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to own handguns.
ANSWER: Antonin Scalia [or Antonin Gregory Scalia; or Nino Scalia]
<Social Science>
Answerlines and category may not exactly match the version played at all sites

Back to bonuses

Conversion

TeamOpponentPart 1Part 2Part 3TotalParts
Arizona StateWUSTL B100010E
Cornell AChicago B0000
Georgia StateLSE001010M
Georgia TechMinnesota100010E
Illinois AColumbia A0000
Illinois BColumbia B0000
Iowa StateJohns Hopkins100010E
MITTexas0000
NYUBritish Columbia100010E
North Carolina BMichigan1001020EM
NorthwesternNorth Carolina A001010M
Ohio StateCornell B1001020EM
Penn StateOttawa0000
RITWinona State0000
StanfordWUSTL A10101030EHM
Toronto AChicago A1001020EM
Toronto CToronto B001010M
UC Berkeley AIndiana001010M
UC Berkeley BYale001010M
VanderbiltUCF001010M
VirginiaMaryland1001020EM
Virginia TechHarvard001010M
Waterloo ARutgers100010E
Waterloo BFlorida1001020EM

Summary

TournamentExact Match?HeardPPBEasy %Medium %Hard %
2025 ACF NationalsYes2410.4246%54%4%