Bonus
When this process is performed post-training, the AdaRound algorithm may be used to minimize loss. For 10 points each:
[10h] Name this process that is classified as either symmetric or asymmetric, depending on whether a zero-point is specified. Applying this process to LLMs has dramatically reduced their VRAM (“vee-RAM”) requirements.
ANSWER: quantization [accept binarization; accept more specific answers such as post-training quantization or quantization-aware training; prompt on PTQ or QAT]
[10m] Quantized neural networks often utilize “straight-through estimators” to estimate “surrogate” examples of this function. In a process named for it, the product of this function with a constant is repeatedly subtracted from the objective function.
ANSWER: gradient [accept surrogate gradient or gradient descent; prompt on SGD; prompt on del]
[10e] Quantization works by reducing the precision of this data type, which is defined in IEEE 754. Doubles are a more precise variant of this type, which is the most common type used to represent decimal numbers.
ANSWER: floats [accept floating-point numbers or FP]
<Other Science>
Answerlines and category may not exactly match the version played at all sites
Conversion
Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
British Columbia | Minnesota | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Cornell A | Vanderbilt | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Cornell B | Illinois B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Florida | Indiana | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Georgia Tech | UC Berkeley A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Harvard | North Carolina A | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Iowa State | Yale | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Johns Hopkins | Ohio State | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
NYU | RIT | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Northwestern | UC Berkeley B | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Ottawa | LSE | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Penn State | Toronto C | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Rutgers | Illinois A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Texas | Arizona State | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Toronto A | Columbia B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
UCF | Georgia State | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Virginia | Chicago B | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Virginia Tech | Stanford | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
WUSTL B | Michigan | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Waterloo B | North Carolina B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
Winona State | Chicago A | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Summary
Tournament | Exact Match? | Heard | PPB | Easy % | Medium % | Hard % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 ACF Nationals | Yes | 21 | 15.71 | 100% | 57% | 0% |