Bonus
This class of methods is contrasted with another class in which the differential operator is approximated with difference quotients. For 10 points each:
[10m] Name this class of numerical methods that solve a PDE by defining a discrete mesh and solving the problem on each component. The stiffness matrix is computed in this subclass of the Galerkin method.
ANSWER: finite element methods [accept finite element analysis or FEM or FEA; reject “finite difference method” or “finite volume method” or “FDM” or “FVM”]
[10e] Finite element methods use an operator named for this process, in which data are estimated at points between known data points.
ANSWER: interpolation [or interpolating; accept interpolation operator]
[10h] After discretizing, the existence of a solution to the adjoint problem is guaranteed by a theorem named for this mathematician, which also underpins bra-ket notation. This mathematician’s brother is the alphabetically first namesake of a theorem about interpolating operators on L-p (“big-L-P”) spaces.
ANSWER: Frigyes Riesz (“FREE-jesh REESS”) [accept Riesz representation theorem or Riesz-Fréchet representation theorem or Riesz–Thorin interpolation theorem; reject “Marcel Riesz”]
<Other Science>
Answerlines and category may not exactly match the version played at all sites
Conversion
| Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona State | Ottawa | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Chicago A | WUSTL A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Chicago B | MIT | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Columbia A | Northwestern | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Columbia B | RIT | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Florida | Penn State | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Georgia State | British Columbia | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Georgia Tech | Cornell A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Illinois B | Virginia | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Johns Hopkins | Harvard | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| LSE | UC Berkeley B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Maryland | North Carolina B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Michigan | Cornell B | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Minnesota | Iowa State | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Rutgers | Indiana | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Stanford | North Carolina A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Toronto C | Texas | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| UC Berkeley A | Illinois A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| UCF | Winona State | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Vanderbilt | Ohio State | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Virginia Tech | Toronto B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Waterloo A | Toronto A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Waterloo B | NYU | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
| Yale | WUSTL B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Summary
| Tournament | Exact Match? | Heard | PPB | Easy % | Medium % | Hard % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 ACF Nationals | Yes | 24 | 13.75 | 100% | 38% | 0% |