Bonus
A many-electron system’s state can be represented with a reduced form of this matrix for two electrons rather than with the full wave function. For 10 points each:
[10m] Name this matrix that is constructed by summing the outer products of state vectors. This matrix is often used to represent mixed states.
ANSWER: density matrix [or density operator; accept two-electron reduced density matrix; prompt on 2-RDM]
[10e] Methods based on the two-electron density matrix, or 2-RDM methods, compute this state for many-electron systems. In QM, electrons can absorb energy to transition from this state to an excited state.
ANSWER: ground state
[10h] Two answers required. A 2-RDM method resolved a discrepancy concerning energy barriers to these two possible pathways for the ring opening of two butadiene derivatives. These terms describe the ways end carbons are repositioned when a sigma bond forms.
ANSWER: disrotatory AND conrotatory [accept suprafacial AND antarafacial]
<Chemistry>
Answerlines and category may not exactly match the version played at all sites
Conversion
Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
British Columbia | NYU | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Chicago B | Cornell A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
Georgia State | LSE | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Georgia Tech | Minnesota | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Illinois A | Columbia A | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | MEH |
Illinois B | Columbia B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Johns Hopkins | Iowa State | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
MIT | Texas | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | MEH |
Maryland | Virginia | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
North Carolina A | Northwestern | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
North Carolina B | Michigan | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Ohio State | Cornell B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Penn State | Ottawa | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Stanford | WUSTL A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
Toronto A | Chicago A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Toronto C | Toronto B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
UC Berkeley A | Indiana | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | MEH |
UCF | Vanderbilt | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EH |
Virginia Tech | Harvard | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
WUSTL B | Arizona State | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | ME |
Waterloo A | Rutgers | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | MEH |
Waterloo B | Florida | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Winona State | RIT | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Yale | UC Berkeley B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
Summary
Tournament | Exact Match? | Heard | PPB | Easy % | Medium % | Hard % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 ACF Nationals | Yes | 24 | 15.42 | 100% | 33% | 21% |