Bonus
Most modern datacenter fabrics utilize this topology’s two-tier spine-leaf architecture. For 10 points each:
[10h] Give this network topology named for an American, who originally developed it for telephone networks. This topology typically implements crossbars in three layers parametrized by n, m, and r.
ANSWER: Clos (“cloh”) network [or Clos topology]
[10m] One proof that the Clos network is rearrangeably nonblocking relies on Hall’s theorem, which guarantees perfect matchings in graphs with this property. Graphs with this property contain no odd-length cycles.
ANSWER: bipartite graph [or bipartiteness]
[10e] One-sided “folded” Clos networks are also named for “fat” examples of these structures. Loop-free Ethernet protocols are guaranteed by a protocol named for the “spanning” type of these structures.
ANSWER: trees [accept fat tree network; accept spanning tree protocol; accept minimum spanning trees; prompt on STP; prompt on MST]
<Other Science>
Answerlines and category may not exactly match the version played at all sites
Conversion
| Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona State | Toronto A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| British Columbia | WUSTL B | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| Chicago A | Columbia A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| Georgia Tech | Texas | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| Illinois B | Iowa State | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| Indiana | MIT | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| Johns Hopkins | Stanford | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| LSE | Maryland | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| NYU | Illinois A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| Northwestern | Georgia State | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| Ohio State | Virginia Tech | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| Ottawa | Harvard | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| Penn State | Virginia | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| Rutgers | RIT | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| Toronto B | Michigan | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| Toronto C | Chicago B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| UC Berkeley A | North Carolina B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| UC Berkeley B | UCF | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| WUSTL A | Florida | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
| Waterloo A | Vanderbilt | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| Waterloo B | Columbia B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ME |
| Winona State | Minnesota | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | E |
Summary
| Tournament | Exact Match? | Heard | PPB | Easy % | Medium % | Hard % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 ACF Nationals | Yes | 22 | 15.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% |